Naomi Campbell Age 2026: How Old Is Naomi Campbell?

Last updated: November 7, 2026  ·  By Nathan Cole

Naomi Campbell is 56 years old in November 2026. She was born Naomi Elaine Campbell on May 22, 1970, in Streatham, South London, and she turned 56 on May 22, 2026. She turns 57 on May 22, 2027. The maths is simple — 2026 minus 1970 is 56, and her birthday has already passed this year — but the number lands hard because of what it contains: a modelling career that started when she was seven years old, in a Bob Marley video, and has now run for 49 years. She is worth an estimated $80 million, anchored at the figure Celebrity Net Worth lists and Wealthy Gorilla confirmed in its November 6, 2026 update, inside an $80–120 million range that this article explains source by source.

She is not a retired name from a fashion history book. In 2026 she played herself in The Devil Wears Prada 2, released May 1, 2026, sitting beside Meryl Streep’s Miranda Priestly at a Dolce & Gabbana show filmed live during Milan Fashion Week. She fronted Burberry campaigns through 2025 and 2026. She was photographed on the streets of Madrid on April 24, 2026, still working the camera the way she did at 17, when she became the first Black model on the cover of British Vogue. The V&A Museum gave her a full retrospective, “NAOMI”, that ran from June 2024 to April 2025 — the kind of honour museums usually reserve for designers and dead legends, given here to a living model at 54.

This is the full story of the 56 years: the Streatham childhood raised by a single mother, the Covent Garden discovery at 15, the two Vogue firsts before her nineteenth birthday, the 1990s run as one of the original Big Five supermodels, the singing and acting detours, the charity she founded and the inquiry that followed it, the two children she welcomed at 50 and 53, and the money she has kept from a career that most models finish in their twenties. Every age in this article is worked out from the same birth date, May 22, 1970, so a reader can check the maths at every step.

How Old Is Naomi Campbell? The Answer and the Maths

Naomi Campbell is 56 years old in November 2026. She was born on May 22, 1970, in Streatham, South London. Subtract 1970 from 2026 and the answer is 56, and because her birthday fell in May — six months before this article was written — there is no rounding to argue about. She spent the first five months of 2026 as a 55-year-old and has been 56 since May 22. She will be 57 on May 22, 2027.

The number surprises people for two reasons. First, she has been famous for so long that the brain files her as older than she is: a woman who was on the cover of British Vogue in December 1987 feels like she must be pushing 60, and she is not — she was 17 when that cover came out. Second, she has stayed visible for so long that the brain files her as younger than she is: a woman who walked a Dolce & Gabbana show in 2026 and had a baby at 53 feels like she must be in her forties, and she is not either. Both instincts are wrong in opposite directions, and the birth certificate settles both. She is 56, with a career that started at seven and a public life that has now run for 49 of those 56 years.

That length is the real story of her age. Most models get five or six good years. Campbell got five decades. She was a child in a music video at seven, a working model at 15, a history-maker at 17 and 18, a supermodel through her twenties, a singer and actress in her mid-twenties, a charity founder at 35, a mother at 50 and 53, and a museum retrospective subject at 54. At 56 she is still booking campaigns and film cameos. The age is not a trivia answer. It is the frame that makes the career legible: nobody else in fashion has held the top of the profession across five separate decades.

One more check for readers who land here from a search result that says 55 or 57. A page that says 55 was written before May 22, 2026, and is out of date. A page that says 57 is either counting ahead to her next birthday or working from the wrong birth year. The date is May 22, 1970, and in November 2026 that makes her 56. Every age that follows in this article is calculated from that date.

Naomi Campbell Age by Age: The Career Timeline

The fastest way to grasp a 49-year career is to read it as ages. The table below puts every major turn of Campbell’s life next to the age she was when it happened, all calculated from May 22, 1970. Read it top to bottom and the shape of the career appears: a child start, a teenage breakthrough, a twenties peak, a thirties reinvention, and a fifties second act that most of her peers never attempted.

Two rows in that table do the most work. The first is 1978: a seven-year-old in a reggae video is not a model yet, but it is a child who was already comfortable in front of a camera, and it explains why the discovery at 15 did not feel like a cold start. The second is 2021: a woman announcing a daughter at 50, days before her 51st birthday, then a son at 53, rewrote the public script for when a model’s life is supposed to narrow. Most timelines of a model’s life end at 30. Campbell’s keeps going, and the table shows why her age keeps drawing searches: every decade of her life has a headline in it.

Early Life in Streatham: A Dancer’s Daughter, Raised by One Parent

Naomi Elaine Campbell was born on May 22, 1970, in Streatham, a district in South London. Her mother, Valerie Morris-Campbell, was a Jamaican-born dancer. Her father was absent from her life. That last fact is stated plainly in every serious biography of her, and it shaped the household she grew up in: a working dancer raising a daughter alone in London, in a city where a Black single mother in the 1970s carried a heavier load than most.

Valerie’s profession mattered more than the biographies usually admit. A dancer’s child grows up around rehearsal rooms, costumes, mirrors, and the discipline of a body trained for performance. Campbell did not come to modelling from nowhere — she came from a home where movement, posture, and presentation were daily work. Her mother danced for a living, and the daughter learned early that a body could be a career. That is the through-line from the Streatham flat to the Paris runway: the training started at home, years before any agency saw her.

She is British, of Jamaican descent, and the Jamaican part of that sentence has followed her through her whole career. She has spoken about her heritage across the decades, and it is part of why the Vogue covers mattered the way they did: a Black British teenager of Jamaican descent, raised by a Jamaican-born mother in South London, was not the face the British fashion establishment had ever put on its flagship cover before December 1987. She was not an import. She was London-born, and the cover was a London story.

The childhood also explains the toughness that became her reputation. A single-parent household in 1970s South London does not produce a sheltered teenager. Campbell has described a childhood that demanded self-reliance early, and the fashion world she entered at 15 rewarded exactly that quality — and punished its absence. The industry she walked into was not gentle, and she has never pretended otherwise. The girl who survived Streatham and Covent Garden was not going to be broken by a runway schedule.

Then came the video. In 1978, at seven years old, Campbell appeared in the video for Bob Marley’s “Is This Love”. It is a small credit — a child in a music video — but it is the first time her face was ever recorded for a mass audience, and it is the detail that makes her timeline strange. Most models can date their public life to a first cover or a first show. Campbell’s public life starts with a reggae legend’s video when she was still in primary school. She was famous-adjacent before she was a teenager, and the camera was never a stranger to her after that.

Discovered at 15 in Covent Garden — and Two Vogue Firsts Before 19

Campbell was 15 when she was discovered, window-shopping in Covent Garden in central London. The story has been told so often that it sounds like a fairy tale, and the fairy-tale version skips the part that matters: a scout does not stop a random 15-year-old. The scout stopped a 15-year-old who was already 5 ft 10 in, already at ease in front of a camera since the age of seven, and already carrying herself the way her dancer mother carried herself. Discovery is the word the industry uses. The preparation had been going on for years.

What happened next happened fast. Within two years she was on the cover of British Vogue, in December 1987, at 17 years old — the first Black model ever to appear on that cover. The magazine had been publishing since 1916. It took 71 years and a 17-year-old from Streatham to put a Black woman on its front. The cover is the single most cited fact of her life, and it deserves the weight: British Vogue was the house magazine of the British fashion establishment, and Campbell’s face on it was a break with seven decades of habit.

Eight months later she did it again. In August 1988, at 18, she became the first Black woman on the cover of French Vogue. Two countries, two flagship editions, two firsts, before her nineteenth birthday. The French cover carried its own sting: the story that has followed her career is that she got the cover only after her friend Yves Saint Laurent threatened to pull his advertising from the magazine unless she was used. Whether the threat was the cause or the cover was coming anyway, the fact stands that a designer of Saint Laurent’s weight had to put his money behind her before French Vogue would print her face. That is the measure of the barrier she was crossing at 18.

The two covers also fixed her height and her look in the public mind. At 5 ft 10 in (178 cm), she was tall even for a model, and the height became part of the brand: the long stride, the way she filled a runway, the silhouette that photographers could spot from the back of a room. She was not a pretty teenager who happened to photograph well. She was a presence, and the two Vogue covers in 1987 and 1988 were the industry admitting it.

There is a detail worth keeping straight. Some round-ups credit her with being the first Black model on the cover of American Vogue. She was not — that honour belongs to Beverly Johnson, in August 1974. Campbell’s firsts were British Vogue and French Vogue, and they are large enough without borrowing anyone else’s. The British cover in December 1987 and the French cover in August 1988 are the two that carry her name, and they are the two this article prints.

The Supermodel 1990s: One of the Original Big Five

The 1990s made Campbell a supermodel, and the word meant something specific then. She was one of the original Big Five — herself, Cindy Crawford, Linda Evangelista, Christy Turlington and Claudia Schiffer — the five women whose names the public knew the way it knew film stars’ names. They walked the same shows, shared the same covers, and sang together in George Michael’s “Freedom! ’90” video, a four-minute clip that fixed the group in the culture more firmly than any runway ever could. Campbell was the only Black woman in the five. She was also the one with the longest walk — the stride that closing shows were built around.

The runways she worked in those years read like a list of the houses that defined the decade: Versace, Chanel, Dior, Prada, Marc Jacobs. Gianni Versace, in particular, built his shows around her, and the Versace runway of the early 1990s is impossible to picture without her in it. The designers did not hire her as a token. They hired her because a Versace show closed harder with Campbell at the end of it than it did without her. The walk was the product, and hers was the best in the business.

The money of the supermodel years was real, and it was new. The Big Five were the first models to earn fees that looked like film-star fees, and the first to be paid for their names rather than their hours. Campaign contracts, cosmetics deals, and licensing put Campbell’s earnings in a different league from the working models of the decade before her. No per-deal figure from those years has been published in a form this article can verify, so none is printed here — but the shape of the money is clear from the career that followed: the 1990s paid for the property, the charity, and the independence that let her keep working on her own terms for the next thirty years.

The decade also gave her the reputation that has trailed her ever since — the temper, the phone-throwing stories, the walkouts. This article does not re-litigate every tabloid story from 30 years ago, but it does not pretend the reputation was invented either: Campbell herself has spoken about anger and about the behaviour that cost her work, and the record shows jobs lost as well as jobs won. The honest version is that the 1990s gave her everything — the covers, the contracts, the name — and charged her for it in public scrutiny that none of the other four faced in the same way. A Black woman at the top of a white industry in the 1990s was judged by a different ruler, and the ruler showed up in the coverage.

What lasted from the decade was the name. Crawford retired from full-time modelling. Evangelista stepped back. Turlington and Schiffer moved on. Campbell kept walking. At 56 she is the last of the Big Five still taking runway and campaign work at anything like her old pace, and that is the statistic that makes her age a news question rather than a trivia question. The other four became history. She stayed current.

Singing, Acting, Books and Television: The Work Beyond the Runway

Campbell has never been a model only. In 1994, at 24, she released her debut album, Babywoman. The record was a commercial disappointment in Britain and America, and the reviews were unkind, but it sold well in Japan — enough to show that her name travelled further than the fashion pages. The album is remembered now as a curiosity, and that is unfair to the instinct behind it: the Big Five were all being told they were bigger than modelling, and Campbell was the one who tried to prove it with a record contract. She did not become a pop star. She learned the limits of fame as a transferable skill, and the lesson showed in everything she did after.

Acting followed the same pattern — real work, uneven results. She took film and television roles through the 1990s and 2000s, appearing on screen as herself and as characters, and she kept at it long enough that the acting became a second career rather than a one-off experiment. The roles were rarely the lead, and the reviews were rarely the point. The point was that a model in her thirties and forties was still being cast, still being invited onto sets, still being treated as a performer rather than a photograph. The 2026 cameo in The Devil Wears Prada 2 — playing herself, at 56, beside Meryl Streep — is the late payoff of that long, patient second career: she is now cast as Naomi Campbell, the institution, and the role needs no acting.

Television gave her a steadier stage. She has hosted and produced, working behind the camera as well as in front of it, and the hosting work used the skill the runway had trained into her: the ability to hold a room’s attention without seeming to try. She has also written books, adding authorship to a résumé that already covered modelling, singing, acting, and producing. Each of these moves added a line to the income story, and none of them alone would explain an $80 million net worth — but together, across three decades, they are the reason the money kept coming after the peak runway years ended. A model who only models stops earning at 30. Campbell built four more careers on top of the first one.

The business instinct showed earliest in the charity work. In 2005, at 35, she founded Fashion for Relief, staging runway shows to raise money for disaster relief. The idea was simple and it was hers: fashion’s glamour, pointed at a cause. The charity ran shows for two decades and raised serious money — and, as the section later in this article records, it also ran into the inquiry that became the hardest chapter of her public life. The founding of Fashion for Relief at 35 is the hinge of her thirties: the moment she stopped being only the face of other people’s brands and started putting her own name on an organisation.

Motherhood at 50 and 53: “It’s Never Too Late to Become a Mother”

In May 2021, days before her 51st birthday, Naomi Campbell announced the birth of her daughter. She was 50. The announcement came on Instagram, with a photograph of her holding the baby’s feet and a caption that said she had become a mother. Two years later, in June 2023, she announced the birth of her son. She was 53. The caption that time carried the line that has been quoted ever since: “It’s never too late to become a mother.”

The two announcements rewrote the public conversation about her in a single stroke. For thirty years the questions about Campbell had been about the runway, the covers, and the temper. Overnight the questions became about age and motherhood — about a woman who had her first child at 50 and her second at 53, in a profession that treats 30 as old. She did not explain the details. She has never said publicly how the children were conceived or born, and this article does not speculate: the method is her private business, and the fact is the two children. What she did say, in the words she chose herself, was that it is never too late — and the sentence landed because it came from a woman who had spent her whole adult life being told that her time was running out.

The timing matters to the age story. A model who becomes a mother at 50 is not following the usual script, and Campbell has never followed the usual script. The daughter arrived days before her 51st birthday; the son arrived when she was 53. She was 54 when the V&A retrospective opened and 56 when she filmed the Prada 2 cameo. The children did not slow the career down. If anything, the years since 2021 have been among her most visible: the retrospective, the Burberry campaigns, the film cameo, the Madrid photographs. Motherhood at 50 and 53 did not end her public life. It added a chapter to it, and the chapter is the one readers now ask about most.

She has kept the children’s names and faces private, and the coverage has largely respected that. The photographs she shares show feet and hands, not faces. That privacy is consistent with the rest of her personal life: she has never married, and she keeps her romantic life out of the press. The children are the one part of her private life she chose to announce herself, on her own account, in her own words — and the announcement, not the speculation around it, is what this article records.

Naomi Campbell’s Net Worth at 56: The Million Anchor

Naomi Campbell’s net worth in 2026 is an estimated $80–120 million, anchored at $80 million. The anchor is the figure that three separate dated sources converge on: Celebrity Net Worth lists $80 million, Wealthy Gorilla’s update of November 6, 2026 lists $80 million, and Film Daily’s June 2026 survey of the rankings lands on $80 million. The top of the range comes from Celebrihub, which gave $80–120 million in February 2026. Two more trackers sit inside the range: CelebsBiofolio at $85 million and The CA Knowledge at $75–85 million. Put the six sources together and the picture is a tight cluster around $80 million with a long tail up to $120 million — and the $80 million figure is the one the freshest reporting supports.

Why do the sources disagree by as much as $40 million? Because none of them has seen her accounts. Campbell publishes no financial statements, no company filings that name her wealth, and no per-deal fee has ever been disclosed in a form a tracker could check. Every number in the table is an estimate built from the same public material — the runway career, the campaigns, the books, the television work, the property — and different trackers weight that material differently. The honest way to print the figure is the way this article prints it: a range, with the dates, and the anchor named. A page that prints “$120 million” with no source is printing the top of one tracker’s range as if it were a fact. A page that prints “$80 million” with no range is printing the anchor as if the disagreement did not exist. Both are thinner than the truth.

The shape of the money is easier to describe than the total. The fortune was built in layers. The first layer was the runway and the campaigns of the 1990s — the supermodel years, when fees for the Big Five ran higher than anything modelling had paid before. The second layer was the brand work that followed: the cosmetics and fashion contracts, the books, the television hosting and producing, the acting roles. The third layer was the property, bought with the first two layers’ money and held for decades. And the fourth layer is the work she is still doing at 56 — the Burberry campaigns, the film cameo, the appearances — which keep the income coming in a decade when most of her peers stopped earning from fashion entirely.

There is one more thing the range hides: time. Campbell has been earning at the top of her profession for roughly 40 years, since the Vogue covers of 1987 and 1988. A fortune built over 40 years does not need a single huge payday to reach $80 million. It needs steady, high-paid work across four decades, with the money held in property rather than spent. That is the boring truth behind the number, and it is also the most impressive part of it: the $80 million is not a windfall. It is the compound result of never leaving the top of the profession.

Real Estate: Manhattan and a Villa on the Kenyan Coast

The property portfolio is the most concrete part of Campbell’s wealth, and the least documented. Film Daily’s June 2026 reporting attributes two holdings to her: properties in Manhattan and a villa on the Kenyan Indian Ocean coast with a saltwater pool. No purchase price has been published for either holding in a form this article can verify, so no price is printed here — but the two addresses, taken together, say something useful about how the money was kept.

Manhattan is the working base. It is the city where the campaigns are shot, the agencies sit, and the fashion calendar is set, and a property there is both a home and a professional address. The Kenyan villa is the other half of the story: a house on the Indian Ocean coast, with a saltwater pool, in a country she has visited and supported for years. The two properties map the two halves of her life — the working capital and the retreat — and the fact that both have been held for years rather than flipped is the point. Property held for decades is the quiet part of a model’s fortune, and it is the part that survives when the runway fees stop.

What is not printed here is as important as what is. No verified total value for the portfolio exists, and this article does not invent one by adding guessed prices together. The $80 million anchor already includes the property in the trackers’ estimates, and breaking out a property value that no source has reported would be fabrication dressed as detail. Readers who want a number for the houses will have to wait for a sale or a filing. Until then, the honest statement is the short one: Manhattan properties and a Kenyan coastal villa with a saltwater pool, per Film Daily in June 2026.

2026: The Devil Wears Prada 2, Burberry, and Madrid

The year 2026 has been a working year, not a victory lap. On May 1, 2026, The Devil Wears Prada 2 was released, and Campbell appears in it as herself — seated next to Meryl Streep’s Miranda Priestly at the Dolce & Gabbana spring 2026 show, filmed live during Milan Fashion Week. The scene works because it is barely a scene: the film needed the fashion world to feel real, and the fastest way to make it feel real was to put a real supermodel in the front row next to the fictional editor. Campbell, at 56, is the person a film casts when it needs the audience to believe the room.

The Burberry campaigns ran through 2025 and 2026, putting her back in front of a British heritage brand at an age when most models have been retired by the industry for two decades. Burberry is a useful marker: it is the kind of house that hires a model for what she means, not only for how she photographs, and hiring Campbell in 2026 means the brand wanted her history in the frame. The campaigns are the clearest proof in this article that her age is an asset rather than a limit. A 56-year-old in a Burberry campaign is not a nostalgia booking. It is a brand buying the authority that only 49 years in front of a camera can give.

Then there is the street photograph. On April 24, 2026, Campbell was photographed on the streets of Madrid, and the pictures travelled the way street photographs of her always have — because she still dresses like a person who knows the camera is there and does not mind. The Madrid photographs are a small fact, but they belong in this article for a reason: they are dated proof, from April 2026, that she was out, visible, and working the public eye in the same month the Prada 2 cameras were rolling. The 2026 story is not one event. It is a film cameo, a campaign, and a street in Madrid, all in the same spring, all at 56.

Behind the 2026 work sits the retrospective. The V&A Museum’s “NAOMI” ran from June 2024 to April 2025, a full museum show built around a living model — her clothes, her covers, her runway history, laid out as a career rather than a moment. Museums give retrospectives to designers and to the dead. Giving one to a 54-year-old model was the establishment’s way of saying the career was already historic, and the 2026 work is the answer to that: the historic figure is still booking jobs. The retrospective closed in April 2025. Thirteen months later she was on screen beside Meryl Streep.

Fashion for Relief and the Charity Inquiry: What the Record Says

The hardest chapter of Campbell’s public life is also the one that needs the most careful writing, so this section sticks to the record and attributes every claim. In 2005, at 35, she founded Fashion for Relief, a charity that staged runway shows to raise money for disaster relief. For nearly two decades the shows were a fixture of fashion weeks, and the charity raised serious money for its causes. Then, in September 2024, the Charity Commission — the regulator for charities in England and Wales — disqualified Campbell as a trustee of Fashion for Relief for five years.

The inquiry’s findings, as reported at the time, were specific. The Commission found that only 8.5% of the charity’s expenditure went to charitable grants, and it documented unauthorised luxury expenses charged to the charity. Those are the regulator’s findings, and they are the reason the disqualification was imposed. The five-year ban runs from September 2024, and it bars her from serving as a trustee for that period. This article prints the findings because they are a matter of public record, and because a biography that skips them would be a flattering profile rather than an honest one.

The other half of the record matters just as much. As of 2026, Campbell is appealing the decision, and her position — as reported — is that she was the victim of fraud by another trustee, and that the misuse was not hers. That is an allegation she has made, not a finding by the regulator, and this article presents it as her position in an ongoing appeal. The appeal has not been decided in the reporting checked for this article, and no outcome is assumed here. Readers should understand the shape of the dispute: the regulator found the money was misspent, and Campbell says someone else spent it.

What the episode means for the age story is narrow but real. Campbell was 54 when the disqualification landed, in the same year the V&A was mounting her retrospective — the best and worst of her public life arriving in the same twelve months. The charity she founded at 35 became, at 54, the thing that could cost her the reputation she had spent 49 years building. The appeal will decide how the chapter ends. Until then, the fair summary is the short one: a five-year disqualification from September 2024, a finding that 8.5% of expenditure reached charitable grants, and an appeal in which she alleges fraud by another trustee.

Personal Life at 56: Never Married, Private by Choice

Naomi Campbell has never married. That fact appears in every biography of her, and it is usually followed by a list of past relationships that this article will not repeat: she keeps her romantic life private, and the names that the tabloids attached to her over thirty years are not part of the story she has chosen to tell. What she has said, in her own words, is about the children — that it is never too late to become a mother — and the children are the part of her private life she chose to make public. The rest stays private, and the privacy is the point: a woman who has lived in front of cameras since she was seven has drawn a line around the parts of her life that are not for sale.

The household she grew up in explains some of that guardedness. She was raised by a single mother, her father absent, and the lesson of a childhood like that is that the people who stay are the people who earn the right. Her mother, Valerie Morris-Campbell, the Jamaican-born dancer, remains the central figure in her family story — the woman who raised her alone in South London and whose profession taught her daughter that a body could be a career. Campbell has spoken about her mother with affection across the decades, and the relationship is the one family tie she has never hidden.

Outside the runway, her life at 56 is built around the children, the charity work, and the career that has not stopped. She divides her time between London, New York, and the Kenyan coast, where the villa sits. She is 5 ft 10 in tall, a fact that still gets searched as often as her age, and she still works the camera the way she did at 17. The personal life section of a supermodel’s biography usually ends with a marriage and a house. Campbell’s ends differently: two children welcomed at 50 and 53, no marriage, a mother who danced for a living, and a career that is still adding chapters at 56.

Naomi Campbell’s Age Compared With Her Supermodel Peers

Campbell’s age reads differently when it sits next to the women she shared the 1990s with. The table below gives the November 2026 ages of the other Big Five members and the two supermodels who followed them, all calculated from their birth dates. The point is not a ranking. It is a measure of how long the top of the profession can last — and of how unusual Campbell’s working life at 56 really is.

The table makes two things clear. First, Campbell is the youngest of the original Big Five by four years — Crawford is 60, Evangelista is 61, and Schiffer, born three months after her in August 1970, is the same age, 56. Second, she is the one still working at the pace of a working model: campaigns in 2025 and 2026, a film cameo in May 2026, street photographs in Madrid in April 2026. Crawford and Evangelista have stepped back. Schiffer works selectively. Banks and Klum, at 52 and 53, built television careers that replaced the runway. Campbell never replaced the runway. She kept it, and at 56 she is still the member of the group a film casts when it needs a supermodel in the frame.

That is the answer to the question behind the question. People do not search “Naomi Campbell age” because they cannot do subtraction. They search it because a woman who was on the cover of British Vogue in 1987 is still on a film set in 2026, and the brain wants to know how those two facts fit together. The table shows how: she started at seven, she peaked in her twenties, and she never stopped. Fifty-six is not a large number for a person. It is a very large number for a modelling career, and Campbell’s is the largest still running.

Sources & Reporting

This profile was reported from live sources checked on November 7, 2026. The biography facts — birth date and place, family background, the Bob Marley video at seven, the Covent Garden discovery at 15, the British Vogue cover of December 1987 and the French Vogue cover of August 1988, the Big Five years with Versace, Chanel, Dior, Prada and Marc Jacobs, the Babywoman album of 1994, the founding of Fashion for Relief in 2005, the daughter announced in May 2021 and the son announced in June 2023, and the height of 5 ft 10 in (178 cm) — come from Wikipedia and the live SERP reporting checked on November 7, 2026. The net worth figures come from Celebrity Net Worth ($80 million), Wealthy Gorilla (updated November 6, 2026, $80 million), Film Daily’s June 2026 survey of rankings ($80 million), Celebrihub (February 2026, $80–120 million), CelebsBiofolio ($85 million), and The CA Knowledge ($75–85 million), printed here as the $80–120 million range anchored at $80 million. The 2026 developments — the cameo as herself in The Devil Wears Prada 2 (released May 1, 2026), the Dolce & Gabbana spring 2026 show filmed live during Milan Fashion Week, the Burberry campaigns of 2025–2026, and the Madrid photographs of April 24, 2026 — come from live reporting checked on November 7, 2026. The V&A retrospective “NAOMI” (June 2024–April 2025) is per the museum’s own record. The Fashion for Relief findings — the September 2024 five-year trustee disqualification, the 8.5% of expenditure reaching charitable grants, the unauthorised luxury expenses, and the appeal alleging fraud by another trustee — are per the Charity Commission’s inquiry and the reporting of it. The real estate holdings — Manhattan properties and a Kenyan Indian Ocean coast villa with a saltwater pool — are per Film Daily, June 2026. Peer ages in the comparison table are calculated from the peers’ published birth dates. No private records were seen, no figure was invented, and where a claim rests on a single report, it is labeled as reported.

Corrections: if you spot an error in this article, please contact us through the contact page and we will correct it. See our corrections policy.

Frequently Asked Questions